Glass Recycling in North Carolina
Here is a letter I sent today to some NC state Senators concerning what we can do about glass recycling:
Dear Senator:
I am writing you about the need for glass recycling in North Carolina. I work in management at a plant in Lexington, North Carolina for Owens-Illinois, the largest glass container manufacturer in the United States. My job involves both purchasing and processing recycled glass, and so I am intimately involved with glass recycling here in our state.
I understand that bill number S 215, The Litter Reduction Act of 2007, was introduced back in February. By placing a deposit on all containers, including glass, more glass would be recycled and less waste would be sent to our landfills.
My plant purchases cullet, recycled glass, from as far away as Detroit, Michigan and Massachusetts. This increases the cost of cullet to more than $30 a ton over what we can get from in-state. Most of this added cost is due to freight expense. If the cullet we need were readily available in North Carolina, we would save a significant amount in freight expense as well as reduce the amount of gasoline used in intrastate shipping.
Also, the quality of cullet from bottle bill states is significantly better than cullet purchased from in-state. One of our highest rejects at our factory is due to “stones.” A stone is an inclusion of contaminate material in a glass container, and can cause as much as 0.5% of rejected ware at my facility. A stone can be a point of stress in the bottle. If it is not caught by our inspection machines, it is possible that it can be sent to a filling line and literally explode. Most stones are due to contamination from in-state cullet. Cullet processed in North Carolina comes from what is called “3-mix”: plastic, aluminum and glass from curbside recycling. “3-mix” also has contaminates such as pottery, porcelain, cookware, rocks, and all kinds of metals which cannot be melted in our furnaces and end up as stones. “Bottle bill” glass is processed from deposit container programs which do not have the amount of contamination seen in curbside recycling.
Finally, the more glass that is recycled instead of sent to a landfill, the less natural gas and electricity is used in glass manufacturing. For every 10% of cullet used instead of virgin batch materials, there is an energy savings of about 100,000 BTUs per ton of glass melted.
I urge your support in the passage of S 215. It makes good business sense as well as good environmental practice. It’s a win-win for my company, our community, and the state of North Carolina. Please contact me at your convenience if you have any questions concerning this matter.
Richard Dreyfuss on Civics
I listened to Bob Edward’s interview of Richard Dreyfuss this morning on NPR. Here he is again on Bill Maher suggesting that if our current state of apathy continues, democracy will die a silent death. He suggests civics needs to be taught in the schools again. The future survival of liberty and democracy is dependant on us. We must be an active and educated participant in this process. Its easy for all of us to fall prey to the spin, sound-bites, and empty rhetoric from Washington. We are told what is going on by a media that filters everything for us and are asked to take it in without question. We must take the time to educate and think for ourselves.
Understanding the Game
The NY Times reported today about further U.N. sanctions on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The proposal would place an arms embargo on Iran as well as additional financial restricitions. Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s continued defiance was expected. Iran has accelerated their uranium enrichment in response to the first wave of U.N. sanctions. Further sanctions will only embolden them.
The Bush Administration will spin this off as a hard stand against terrorism. Do not buy it. This is just another play in their failed diplomacy game. The result is a world where the unspoken truth is: to be nuclear is to be relevant. Iran understands this game perfectly well. U.S. foreign policy continues to push Iran to the point where obtaining a nuclear capability is in their best interest.
This article points out how Bush’s diplomacy continues to flounder because of his inability to judge power relationships. The question I’d like answered is no longer if there is a plan to bomb Iran, but when does the bombing campaign begin?
To be continued…